WEBSITE NAVIGATION

 

Taylor Swift: High Profiles the ‘Nazi’ Constituent of Fiefdom-

Totalitarian Commu-Nazi Genocidal Racism 

and 

Chinada Principals are Willing to Take a Bullet to the Brain for Their Beliefs 

© 2009 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.

Barrister & Solicitor 

 

Just how serious the threat posed by the China-Canada military alliance can be gauged in many ways.  One is to observe the coalition’s growing size.  Another is to review the many thousand individual diplomatic communiqués.  Another is to focus on coercive diplomacy.  And yet another approach is to observe how some coalition partners are willing to take a publicity hit for appearing to do something politically incorrect.  

 

The reaction to what is documented herein came during next day’s early morning hours. The Custodian Chief Executive was hypno-awakened; being so was corroborated with a siren – a standard methodology of malfeasance confirmation for years.  He was hypno-instructed to use the bathroom and then compelled to hear a female street soldier yapping in the hallway and who slammed her apartment door.  He checked the time of this arrogant belligerence employing stealth cognition technologies and the militarization and institutionalization of stalking.  Like a marionette he was instructed to rise at 3:46 – a Taylor Identifier, use the facilities at 3:47 – a coalition identifier and assassination reminder and walked out at 3:48 –a double coalition identifier. Clearly, Chinada principals are willing to take a bullet in the brain for their beliefs.

 

 

Another mega-star has decided that the risk to reputation is worth making a statement of principle because the subject-matter involves the most serious circumstance facing the early 21st century: the coalition’s “most Geo Award acknowledged uber-supernova amongst superstars” Taylor Swift (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).  She attended the birthday party of a musical colleague on October 24, 2009 and enthusiastically danced right into controversy of the same calibre as two other coalition partners.  The colors of Canada stand out in these carefully scripted instances of Photographic Diplomacy, as does the bullet to the brain depiction.  This initiative earns Taylor her 9th Geo Award nomination.

 

 

 

[quantum - Presidential quantum, the ‘Nazi’ constituent of fiefdom-

totalitarian commu-Nazi genocidal racism]

 

 

[bullet hole in the forehead communiqué] 

 

Best of the Rest: Taylor Swift poses for picture with fan wearing swastika

New York Daily News

October 30th 2009  

Taylor Swift’s Swastika Shock

by Danielle Berrin

jewishjournal.com

October 29, 2009  

Taylor Swift doesn't know fan with Nazi symbol

OneIndia.in

October 30, 2009   

Taylor Swift in racism row after posing with fan wearing swastika daubed on shirt

by Donna Mcconnell

Daily Mail (UK)

October 20, 2009

 

 

In January 2005 as the Fiefdom treatise author was drawing the conclusions that would land him in a Dogville psych ward and tortured with ever-increasing doses of anti-psychotic drugs, the first members of the coalition had already produced a multitude of diplomatic productions; having begun the process in the spring of 2003 and getting more assertive the following year. 

 

When the treatise conclusions on the secret de facto governance and militarization of Canada by China and the totalitarian leadership seeking global hegemony, the Royal Family spoke up; and so loudly that it caught the ire of the world.  The following was posted and argued in Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II: Ratifies and Corroborates the Transfer of Sovereign Authority to the Custodian-in-Council:

 

How the Queen’s Royal House Put Nazi Atrocities on the International

Front Page to Direct Attention to the Last Democratic Fiefdom 

© 2005 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.

Barrister & Solicitor

 

On January 12, 2004 the international press ran a news item that Prince Harry had attended a party wearing a Nazi swastika.  The uproar was immediate, expected and damaging to the reputation of the Royal Family.  The Canadian preferred to see this circumstances in a more circumspect manner.  

 

 

 

Clearly, anybody of even nominally high school graduated intelligence in a wealthy news-centric family would appreciate what being photographed wearing one of the most identifiably horrific symbols of the 20th century, would cause.  With the coalition of human rights enforcers still reasonably prevented from employing the media to procure Chinese-Liberal capitulation, this, as with other news events reported in the Fiefdom treatise, was manufactured to bring the Queen’s enormous Commonwealth power, affluence and resources to bear on the deconstruction of the last democratic fiefdom.  

 

 

Another super high profile individual that replicated this kind of anticipated protest was Miley Cyrus, who scripted this 2008 Geo Award nominated initiative in Photographic Diplomacy which condemned China for what it’s done and is planning to do:

 

 

Miley Cyrus w/ Friends

February 4, ‘09

[China condemnation, Canada punishment certainty, justice]

 

 

As is argued in How the Next Generation of Coalition Partner is Confronting Chinada's Imperialism:

 

The stakes are so high that some of the most high profile in the world are willing to sacrifice a bit of bad press to make it undeniably clear everything will be done to save the world from a 21st century Dark Ages – which is what will happen if the spread of fiefdom-totalitarian commu-nazi genocidal racism goes unchecked.  The coalition’s youngest are willing upon understanding this trans-generational threat to sacrifice their professional reputations to challenge the Chinada menace.  

[…] 

Given what she did to advance coalition interests and objectives in 2008 it is logical she would undertake even more diplomatically aggressive action, even if it was predicted in advance to be reputationally risky.  She’s already been in the very uncomfortable condemnation spotlight for her April ’08 Vanity Fair photoshoot.  To put her credibility at stake again, especially in a demographic that can be very unforgiving, knowing there would be an intense backlash globally (see news reports from around the world below) demonstrates the same kind of dedication regardless of the costs as His Royal Highness.  

[headlines from articles reproduced in the chapter]  

Miley Cyrus: I'm Not Racist

Fox News (United States)

February 5, 2009  

Miley Cyrus denies racist pose 

BBC (United Kingdom)

February 6, 2009 

Miley Cyrus Denies Racial Slur

The Celebrity Truth (Australia)

February 6, 2009  

Miley Cyrus defends 'racist' photograph

Welt Online (Germany)

February 6, 2009 

Miley Cyrus "goofy face" photo taken out of context

Reuters India

February 6, 2009  

Is Miley Cyrus racist for slant-eye photo?

Daily Contributor (Philippines)

February 4, 2009  

   

 

WEBSITE NAVIGATION

 

Make a Free Website with Yola.